Lee Calvert is a Bradford man who has been the subject of significant media attention and public debate due to his involvement in a high-profile criminal case. His case has raised questions about justice, the criminal justice system, and the nature of evidence.
The Crime and Conviction
Lee Calvert was convicted of murder and possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life in 2014. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 36 years, later reduced to 32 years on appeal.
The crime involved the brutal murder of Barry Selby, who was shot in the leg and had acid poured over him. Selby died three days later in hospital from organ failure caused by the corrosive substance.
Calvert was found guilty alongside three other men, Joseph Lowther, Robert Woodhead, and Andrew Feather, who were also sentenced for their roles in the crime.
The Appeal and New Evidence
Calvert’s family has always maintained his innocence and has fought tirelessly to have his conviction overturned. In 2023, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) referred his case to the Court of Appeal for a fresh hearing on the basis of new evidence.
The new evidence has not been publicly disclosed, but it is believed to relate to the reliability of the prosecution witnesses and the credibility of their testimonies. Calvert’s family hopes that the new evidence will cast doubt on his conviction and lead to his release.
Public Opinion and Controversy
The Lee Calvert case has generated significant public interest and controversy. Many people believe that Calvert was wrongfully convicted and that there are serious flaws in the evidence against him. Others maintain that the evidence is strong and that Calvert is guilty of the crimes he was convicted of.
The case has raised questions about the fairness of the justice system and the potential for miscarriages of justice. It has also highlighted the importance of thorough investigations and the need for evidence to be rigorously scrutinized.
The Ongoing Appeal
The appeal against Calvert’s conviction is currently pending before the Court of Appeal. The outcome of the appeal could have significant implications for Calvert’s future and for the justice system as a whole.
The case of Lee Calvert serves as a reminder of the complexities of the criminal justice system and the importance of ensuring that justice is served. It is a case that has captured the public imagination and continues to generate debate and discussion.
FAQs
Who is Lee Calvert and what crime was he convicted of?
Lee Calvert, a resident of Bradford, was convicted in 2014 for his involvement in the brutal murder of Barry Selby. At the age of 23, Calvert was found guilty of participating in a heinous attack that involved shooting Selby in the leg and subsequently pouring acid over him. The incident occurred in October 2013, and Selby succumbed to his injuries three days later in the hospital. Calvert, along with his accomplices Joseph Lowther, Robert Woodhead, and Andrew Feather, was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 36 years. The court proceedings revealed that Calvert had fired the gun and administered the acid, actions that were pivotal in the fatal outcome. This case has been a significant point of discussion in Bradford, highlighting the severe consequences of violent crime and the judicial system’s response to such acts.
What were the circumstances leading to Barry Selby’s murder?
Barry Selby’s murder was a result of a violent altercation that escalated to a fatal attack. On the night of October 14, 2013, Selby was at his home on Raleigh Street, East Bowling, when he was confronted by Lee Calvert and his accomplices. The attack was premeditated, with Calvert shooting Selby in the leg and then pouring acid over him. The motive behind the attack was not fully disclosed during the trial, but it was clear that the actions were deliberate and malicious. The brutality of the crime shocked the local community and underscored the dangers of escalating violence. Selby’s death three days later in the hospital highlighted the severe nature of his injuries and the lethal combination of gunshot wounds and acid burns.
How did the legal proceedings unfold for Lee Calvert and his accomplices?
The legal proceedings for Lee Calvert and his accomplices were extensive and complex. Following their arrest, the case went to trial at Bradford Crown Court, where detailed evidence was presented against them. The prosecution’s case was built on witness testimonies, forensic evidence, and the sequence of events leading to Barry Selby’s death. Calvert and his co-defendants were found guilty after a lengthy trial, with the judge emphasizing the premeditated and brutal nature of their actions. In June 2014, Calvert was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 36 years. His accomplices received similarly severe sentences, reflecting the gravity of their involvement in the crime. The trial and subsequent sentencing were widely covered in the media, drawing attention to the case and its implications for the community.
What has been the reaction of Lee Calvert’s family and supporters?
Lee Calvert’s family and supporters have been vocal in their belief in his innocence. Since his conviction, they have continued to fight for his release, arguing that there were significant flaws in the trial process. Calvert’s mother, Karen, and his sister, Kelly, have been particularly active in seeking new evidence and witnesses to support their claims. They have raised concerns about the identification process, noting that Calvert was convicted based on an identity parade where he wore a balaclava, and a witness claimed to recognize his eyes. Despite losing an appeal in 2016, the family remains determined to clear his name and have enlisted the help of investigative teams to find new evidence. Their persistent efforts highlight the emotional toll the case has taken on them and their unwavering belief in Calvert’s innocence.
What new developments have emerged in Lee Calvert’s case?
In recent years, there have been new developments in Lee Calvert’s case that have reignited discussions about his conviction. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has referred his case to the Court of Appeal, citing potential new evidence that could impact the original verdict. This development has given hope to Calvert’s family and supporters, who believe that the new evidence could prove his innocence. The specifics of the new evidence have not been fully disclosed, but it has been suggested that there were significant errors and gaps in the original trial. The referral to the Court of Appeal is a critical step in the ongoing efforts to review and potentially overturn Calvert’s conviction. This process underscores the importance of thorough and fair legal proceedings and the possibility of rectifying judicial errors.
How has the community reacted to the ongoing appeals and new evidence?
The community’s reaction to the ongoing appeals and new evidence in Lee Calvert’s case has been mixed. While some members of the community support the efforts to review the case and believe in the possibility of Calvert’s innocence, others remain convinced of his guilt based on the original trial’s findings. The case has sparked broader discussions about the criminal justice system, the reliability of witness testimonies, and the importance of ensuring fair trials. The new developments have also highlighted the emotional and psychological impact on both the victim’s family and the accused’s family. As the case continues to unfold, it remains a topic of significant interest and debate within the community, reflecting the complexities and challenges of the legal system.
What are the broader implications of Lee Calvert’s case for the criminal justice system?
Lee Calvert’s case has broader implications for the criminal justice system, particularly in terms of how violent crimes are prosecuted and the importance of ensuring fair trials. The case has highlighted potential flaws in the identification process and the need for robust evidence to secure convictions. It also underscores the emotional and psychological toll on all parties involved, from the victim’s family to the accused’s family. The ongoing appeals and new evidence have brought attention to the role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission and the importance of reviewing potential miscarriages of justice. Ultimately, the case serves as a reminder of the complexities of the legal system and the need for continuous scrutiny and improvement to ensure that justice is served fairly and accurately.
To read more, Click here
